THis statement is all about setting up the Civil trial when the criminal case is dismissed as being self-defense or Zimmerman is found not guilty.
They will they file suit against Zimmerman (shooter), his family (statements), the Neighborhood association/property owners (not securing property/neighborhood wathc vigilante), the City of Sanford (failure to respond and protect) and the State of Florida (Stand your Ground allowing Zimmerman to have gun) for the “Accidental Death” of their son.
The only caveat is evidence that we have not yet seen, that really cuts against him.
If the judge finds that Zimmerman was more likely than not acting in the course of reasonable fear for his life or serious injury, then there will no NO trials. No accidental death (wrongful death is what the civil claim would be), no murder, no manslaughter, nothing.
Eh...I don’t think so. She probably knows her son attacked, they know he’s no angel.
Good point, it fits with the same mentality when she filed to trademark his name.
How will Zimmerman be held civilly liable for Martin attacking him?
The witnesses, the cops, and the evidence are all going to exonerate this guy and show it was Martin who attacked Zimmerman.
Will Zimmerman be held liable for the damages to the city of Sanford and across the nation when the rioting occurs after he is found not guilty?
“THis statement is all about setting up the Civil trial when the criminal case is dismissed as being self-defense or Zimmerman is found not guilty”
You lost me there friend. Do you mean she is going for a cut in the millions that Zimmerman will get from his suit?