The only thing that really bothers me is what he said at his against-legal-counsel interview with the DA’s office.
If there are facts here that are unreleased and GZ is truthfully guilty of something, I have no problem with him being charged, but man - If he went and gave an interview to a hostile DA and answered a question “incorrectly,” and gave the DA ammunition to trump up a charge, I’m just as frustrated wtih GZ as I am with the prosecutor. He should have known better than to talk to her without counsel present.
That aside, her demeanor was certainly unprofessional and gave the impression of a lack of objectivity or distance from the events.
If you’re referring to the contact a few days ago, my understanding is they hung up on him as soon as they found out who was calling, which would be the appropriate thing to do. They’d have major problems if they’d talked to someone represented by counsel without the lawyer present.
GZ didn’t talk to Corey or anyone on her team. She said in the press conference that GZ called and someone took a message. Law Enforcement is not allowed to talk to a defendant who is represented by counsel unless the defendant waives his right to counsel. Corey refused to speak to GZ.