To: Vendome
(n) Aggravated stalking, Nonsense. Following a suspicious person for a moment, and breaking off after you lose them, while talking to police, (non-emergency, not 911)is not "stalking" under any definition.
102 posted on
04/11/2012 4:00:56 PM PDT by
MileHi
( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
To: MileHi
Hey, I’m just trying to figure this out as we go along.
I can’t even get there with this description as he was and had been a neighborhood watch type for years and it would be expected that he would recognize unusual activity and persons and then direct LEO or other emergency services to the location.
Gonna have to wait and see what the evidence is that none have seen.
If there is additional evidence that points to Zimmerman’s guilt then I’ll go with it but at this point I can’t get there.
119 posted on
04/11/2012 4:06:23 PM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: MileHi; Vendome
Try again:
(n) Aggravated stalking,
Nonsense. Following a suspicious person for a moment, and breaking off after you lose them, while talking to police, (non-emergency, not 911)is not "stalking" under any definition. Let alone "aggravated".
131 posted on
04/11/2012 4:10:21 PM PDT by
MileHi
( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
To: MileHi
If calling in a suspicious person and trying to keep them in sight is stalking, then people are going to decrease the calls in 911. Police around here want to encourage the public to get involved not discourage it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson