Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RinaseaofDs
Can you IMAGINE if McCain had actually won?

Another pro Obama Freeper. rat...It's the new conservatism!

862 posted on 04/10/2012 7:29:04 PM PDT by Once-Ler (There are two paths! One is America, the other is Occupy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: Once-Ler

If Milt Rominy (rhymes with that corn product, hominy) gets the pubby nomination, We The People are going to have to elect enough pubbies to run the Senate and House, so that when little barry bastard is sworn in, again illicitly by the pirate Roberts, the impeachment and removal of the commie scum can proceed over the LDS inc Reid efforts to protect the lying scumbag.


868 posted on 04/10/2012 7:37:05 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 862 | View Replies ]

To: Once-Ler

“Another pro Obama Freeper. rat...It’s the new conservatism!”

So, where do you stand? Are you pro-Romney? I know you are pro socialized medicine, because both candidates not only support it, they AUTHORED it.

How about the SCOTUS? Both guys are going to nominate liberals, because both of their records are prima facia on that fact. You a pro-Sotomayor for Chief Justice guy?

Both candidates will give it to you.

I’m with Alexander Hamilton on this - If we can’t nominate a conservative, then let the liberal win, and let him wear the fruits of his labors.

It’s funny, because it’s not like Hamilton had over 200 years of American electoral experience to utter what he did about the matter. He’d seen the same thing in England.

As such, its what some would call ‘learning from history’. This is one of the original reasons why public education made such a good idea at the time - if people learned history, they may not be inclined to repeat some of the more regrettable aspects of it.

So, here’s the lesson - if you settle for a liberal to represent the conservative party, you guarantee multiple decades of liberal governance at almost every level. This isn’t conjecture - it’s a fact. The liberals will blame ALL conservatives because they nominated a liberal, and are now unhappy with the results of their ‘conservative’ representative.

The liberals have a point. If you want to screw it up, at least be honest about it. Liberals will come out and tell you the Constitution has outlived its usefulness. Massachusetts conservatives will simply flout the Constitution, and trot it out at the midterms.

The only way this sick bunch if party hacks are going to learn is if they lose this election. They, like you, tend to repeat their history. They nominated McCain, pretty much an avowed liberal, and got hammered. They decided it was because people wanted to make history electing a black President, and not because McCain was a double-talking representative of the media elite. There’s not a camera McCain didn’t love.

So, they go out and do it again - hand us a liberal. Now, you can attempt to blame me for another four years of Obama, which already just happened anyway, or you can blame Coulter, Rove, Noonan, Drudge, and the rest of the hacks that did this to you.

The rest of us will just stick to learning from history. They are going to lose despite everything working in the favor of Republicans, and in the end, they will end up blaming us, not them. It’s what liberals do, after all. Especially after living in Capitol City (DC) for too long.

I guess Hunger Games had to come out since nobody seems to understand George Orwell anymore.

2 + 2 is 4, not 5. You lost the election this year no matter who wins. Put some ice on it. Walk it off. Drink a little.


1,080 posted on 04/11/2012 9:14:15 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 862 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson