On the contrary, Romney would do more to sabotage any limited government conservative solution than Obama could even dream of doing. Romney as president would be the defacto head of the Republican party, and Romney HAS THE SAME POSITION on all five major liberal issues as Democrats, for crying out loud!! Romney is ON RECORD as advocating and promoting:
-- nationalized health care
-- on-demand taxpayer-funded abortion
-- the homosexual agenda
-- liberal activist judges (3 out of 4 of his appointees in Mass were not just Democrats, but activist liberal Dems!)
-- cap-and-trade "global warming" environmental regulation that most certainly would end up being global
BizBroker, voting for either Obama or Romney is NUTS.
Voting third party to make sure whichever clown wins, wins by a plurality so low that it's a political indictment against him even as President, THAT is how to make lemonade out of these two lemons.
I'll be crawling over glass (figuratively, God willing!) to vote ABOOR.
So, according to you Romney, with a Conservative House and or Senate, would forestall their agenda. Color me dubious. Romney has no real beliefs. He will go where the leadership and agenda take him.
To say that he would be just as likely as the Commie to do that is not being truthful and it is allowing your hatred for Romney to cloud your judgement.
I have no love for the man, but he is not as evil as Obama.
A win for Obama is a win for Obama. No one will care that he won by a plurality. The media will call it a mandate and we will be stuck with a Communist responsible to no one and the legacy of 3 leftist Supreme Court judges. That does not sound like tasty lemonade to me.