Replies

An interesting use of what I posted. Let me pass this by you. After Roe v Wade was law, a ban on partial birth abortions was being written. One of our notorious freepers who is now running for President was against that law because it did not ban all abortions. Was it evil to not save those who could be saved with the new ban? To pass the ban was in his eyes a compromise with evil. Perhaps he's right, but I'm thankful the 20,000 per year reported partial birth abortions are not now being done. As a matter of perspective, I did not see supporting the partial birth abortion ban as supporting evil. We can both speculate on how Jesus would deal with that enigmatic situation, but in the end we would probably agree that he would allow the fiery sword to go forth and strike ALL the evil, we just didn't have that alternate choice we could make, so we worked to save those we could until the evil of that law (Roe v Wade) can be overturned.