Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sam_paine
It's schizophrenic for FR to freak out about "pro-life" candidates since it doesn't have anything to do with them, and further, if they're going to be consistent, then they would be anti-Reagan today as well.

They are not saying they will only vote for someone who can, as President, change abortion. They are saying that they cannot support a person for President who personally is pro-abortion.

It is about the person's moral character, not the powers of the office. They choose to support only pro-life candidates, regardless of the powers of the office they are running for.

1,151 posted on 04/11/2012 2:11:37 PM PDT by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1107 | View Replies ]


To: 5thGenTexan
It is about the person's moral character, not the powers of the office.

Exactly. A divorcee with enstranged children who authorized the sale of weapons to terrorists like Ronald Reagan would be morally unacceptable to such people.

1,153 posted on 04/11/2012 2:19:00 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson