Sadly, your vote FOR Romney will betray that indulgence. Better to vote ABOOR so that whichever bastard wins, the vote count will conform that he enters office opposed by the majority, which will make him politically vulnerable and which will empower and embolden his opposition.
You mean like when Bill Clinton waltzed in "opposed by the majority" due to a 3rd party candidate....and he went on to appoint, for example, Janet Reno?
Have you honestly thought through what you say? This "win by losing" thing actually makes sense to you?
Why in the hell is there not a decent conservative candidate like Reagan anywhere even on the horizon? All we have is a guy who lost in his home state to a screaming liberal or a narcissistic scholar who bounces checks and rotates through wives or a comical black man who ran a circus campaign or an out of touch Mormon rich guy from a liberal state.
You've got the Tea Party "revolutionaries" all signing on to the Mormon RINO, and what? Where is the majority outpouring at the primary voting booth? Why is it the "establishment's" fault that they've picked the most popular loser that's kept his hat in the ring this long?