[Sola Veritas]

“He is, as Gingrich as accurately labelled him, a “Massachusetts Moderate”. But that is still significantly better than being a Chicago Socialist.”

Newt was being a generous gentleman. Romney is no better than Obama. Don’t fall for that line of thinking. He is not a “moderate.” He also has socialist leanings. The best that can be said about Romney is that he isn’t Marxist.

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Then I'll leave labels out of it. Newt, who I supported and voted for in the primaries, has said that he'll support whomever the GOP nominee is. Including Romney. Sarah Palin has said the same. So have Rubio, Paul Ryan, Allen West, and just about every other elected conservative I can think of. Santorum has even said that.

Now, others here are perfectly free to choose otherwise. However, the argument being made here is that you can't be a conservative if you're voting for Romney in the general election. And by that definition, you've squeezed out everyone listed above, from Palin right on down, and I imagine just about every GOP member of the House and Senate. Probably all our governors as well.

Where does that logic leave us?