“I understand your reasoning. However, on another thread someone posted pictures of aborted babies, and they were gruesome (of course). I was looking at them and thinking that Mitt Romney made that kind of murder possible. For only $50, women in MA today are killing infants, and the blame lies with Romney.”
Same here. I was thinking the pictures were on the wrong thread. They need to be here for the pro Romney people to be confronted with and what they’ll have to answer to God for. As for the argument that it was the supreme court that allowed this, with the rampant abuse of executive orders, what’s to stop Romney from using that with regards to abortion or homosexual marriage? Even if he does nothing, he by his actions has legitimatized both, and will even more so as POTUS.
This makes no sense to me. There is no question that Obama is as pro-choice as it gets, including partial birth abortion. There is no reasoned argument that the reelection of Obama will lessen the number of abortions compared to the election of Romney, and pretty decent reasons to assume the opposite.
As for the argument that it was the supreme court that allowed this, with the rampant abuse of executive orders, what’s to stop Romney from using that with regards to abortion or homosexual marriage?
That makes no legal sense at all. Executive orders cannot bar a state from outlawing abortion, not do they last beyond the term of the President in question. Supreme Court decisions, however, survive until overruled. How's that working out with Roe v. Wade?
We should keep in mind he signed an executive order to force Catholic hospitals in MA to make the abortion pill available.