Replies

Romney doesn't "hate" America ... Neither does Obama

I guess I actually should have used your term. I like it better. You say Obama doesn't hate America. Exactly how differently would he be governing if he did then? I would say that Obama DOES hate America, at least the America formed by our Founding Fathers. Does someone with a strong belief in our founding tell one of our lifelong adversaries "After the election, I will have more flexibility"? He talks down to the Supreme Court about unelected officials, yet he has tens of unelected Czars producing and enforcing legislation that never saw the halls of Congress. He, along with Pelosi and Reid, has taken this nation further down the road of Fascism than I ever dreamed I would see.

You really believe that Romney would govern like this? Romney is not even close to my best pick, but I have a strong feeling that he would govern this country to the right of McCain. That's not saying much, but its a hell of a lot better than watching the final destruction of EVERYTHING we used to be as a nation.

Obama's second term will see the dismantling of our military, he has already halted our space programs, and he allies himself with our lifelong adversaries and distances himself from our true allies (Israel). Hell, he has even pissed off Canada and Great Britain. He shows NO signs of desiring an energy independent USA as he has wasted billions on "solar" shell companies while shutting down all public land drilling. He has strengthened and has given marching orders to union thugs to shut us down and worse case, he may get another one to two more Justices in a second term. He has spent and spent and spent and shows no signs of slowing that down.

And what about race relations? Do you think that they will improve or worsen in the next term? I'm sorry. Romney may suck, but to draw a moral equivalent between the two shows a lack of understanding or an unwillingness to believe in the depths that Obama will aim for in his second term to finally "Fundamentally Transform" America.

“Romney may suck, but to draw a moral equivalent between the two shows a lack of understanding or an unwillingness to believe in the depths that Obama will aim for in his second term to finally “Fundamentally Transform” America.”

Who’s the lesser of two evils is not the problem.

The problem is that half of the population rely on government for subsistance, one way or the other. They vote for big gubmint anyway.

The problem is, that if GOP wanted indeed to beat Obama, they wouldn’t pushed a Mass. Republican, a.k.a. a liberal, for whom “R” stands for “Reformer” for nomination.

The problem is that, without claiming it aloud, many Christian voters won’t choose a Mormon as president.

The problem is that Romney only “won” in blue states, which anyway vote for Obama in national election.

The problem is that Romney suxs.

All these things you tremble that Obama might do in a second term are only possible if : 1) he isn't impeached first, and 2) Congress is filled with Mitt Romney's that will rubber stamp his evil. We are working to impeach him. We are working to load the houses with patriots. We are *NOT* going to set ourselves back in our efforts by willfully electing Romney in his place for POTUS. The fight does not end with the executive office. The fight does does not end in November.

Romney may suck, but to draw a moral equivalent between the two shows a lack of understanding or an unwillingness to believe in the depths that Obama will aim for in his second term to finally "Fundamentally Transform" America.

Bullsh*t. Most of us were well aware of Obama's intentions the moment he took office and understood it all too well. I'm a birther and damn proud of it trying to get the usurper removed before he could wreak this much damage. The "lack of understanding" here is your inability to see the big picture. Would you replace Barack Obama with Hillary Clinton if she ran as our candidate, our standard bearer, a republican? Would you let her represent and define "conservative" values for generations to come -- to redefine "constitutional"? Would you permit her definitions to become the "norm" as representative of our values?

No? I wouldn't either. If you elect Mitt Romney, that's what you get. That's the long term damage that is done. The democrat and republican parties effectively merge.

There's a bigger picture in play than November than you realize.