To: iowamark
I’ll take the mushy moderate over the lying leftist that the wardheelers are pushing.
2 posted on
04/10/2012 7:54:56 AM PDT by
Psalm 144
("I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am." - Willard M Romney)
To: Psalm 144
Yep. For all his flaws, Santorum would still be a big improvement from Obummer, especially if he chose a VP with some real charisma.
8 posted on
04/10/2012 8:05:35 AM PDT by
Cato in PA
(1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)
To: Psalm 144; All
Santorum voted to confirm Sonya Sotomayor to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeal when Clinton nominated her knowing it would fast track her to the Supreme Court and, wouldn't you know it, she was Obama's very first choice. Even John McCain voted against Sotomayor's 2nd Circuit nomination. Rick cannot be trusted on judges.
That's his record.
He also did a TV ad trumpeting his proposal of a $550 million increase over the Bush Amtrak budget of $900 million, positioning himself as an independent voice for PA against the White House. 60% budget hikes? Gosh! What a fiscal conservative that Rick is!
That's his record.
18 posted on
04/10/2012 8:58:53 AM PDT by
newzjunkey
(Newt says, "A nominee that depresses turnout won't beat Barack Obama.")
To: Psalm 144
Santorum's rhetoric is great. The problem is that it doesn't reflect his legislative experience. He has been a high spending, earmark enthusiast, big government senator. Check the record.
19 posted on
04/10/2012 9:12:09 AM PDT by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson