Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Minn. Gov. Dayton Urges Voters to Reject Voter ID Amendment, Says He'll Fight to Defeat It
The Republic ^ | April 09, 2012 | ASSOCIATED PRESS

Posted on 04/09/2012 9:08:00 AM PDT by Son House

ST. PAUL, Minn. — Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton says he's ready to do whatever he can to urge voters to reject the proposed voter ID constitutional amendment that will appear on the ballot in November.

Dayton issued a symbolic veto of the amendment Wednesday, though he has no legal power to stop it from appearing on the ballot. The GOP-controlled Legislature signed off on it last week.

Dayton says the amendment would cripple Minnesota's election system by curbing same-day voter registration, absentee balloting and mail-in voting. Backers say requiring voters to prove their identity is an election integrity measure.

The governor says he doesn't think there is a way to prevent it from going to voters.

(Excerpt) Read more at therepublic.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: amendment; ballotstuffing; dayton; howtostealanelection; id; votefraud; voter; voterid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: susannah59

You realize that Governor Dayton has had serious mental health and alcohol abuse problems, that would disqualify him from holding a security clearance or even enlisting in the Armed Forces. But he’s perfectly fit to be a senator or a governor, because, the liberal press hushes it up and he inherited millions of dollars from the Dayton department store chain, which now operates as Target. His first wife was a Rockefeller.


21 posted on 04/09/2012 9:44:22 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Queeg Olbermann: Ahh, but the strawberries that's... that's where I had them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Conspiracy to steal an election should be a capital offense.

If the governor is willing to push that legislation instead, I could see backing down on requiring photo ID to vote.

Raise the penalties for ballot stuffing.


22 posted on 04/09/2012 9:47:06 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Barack Obama continued to sponsor Jeremiah Wright after he said "G.D. AMERIKKA!"Where's the outrage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter
>”Will those without valid ID’s get to vote on the Constitutional Amendment???”<

In one sentence you just proved why a Representative Republic is far superior than the concept of Direct Democracy.

23 posted on 04/09/2012 9:47:46 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (A day without Obama is like a day without a Tsunami.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

Vote fraud machines: Pick address that can be easily monitored, Mailboxes etc for example, apartment complexes for another, fill out voter registration cards using names from a cemetery or simply make them up, make a copy so you know what the signature looks like.

Now for either primary or general elections you request an absentee ballot for every one of those fake voters, vote the ballot, make sure the signature looks right, mail it back. No need for an ID with picture, no chance of being caught by a poll worker who knows you are not who you say you are. The end result, a stolen election. the voting public is gullible BUT there are some of us who can see and connect the dots.

Now before the general election ask your county registrar for a list of addresses with five or more voters. Go in a group and get face to face with each listed voter. If there is no voter to get face to face with, file charges with your local sheriff. If the registrar refuses to help you you know they are crooked and can act accordingly.


24 posted on 04/09/2012 9:51:23 AM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Obama is Romney lite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: olezip
"Now you just need a pulse..."

Not necessarily.

25 posted on 04/09/2012 10:08:55 AM PDT by Hunton Peck (See my FR homepage for a list of businesses that support WI Gov. Scott Walker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Son House

“Now you just need a pulse, and no ID.:

Actually in some places (like Cook County), you can be six feet under and without a pulse and still vote.


26 posted on 04/09/2012 10:12:46 AM PDT by rod1 (CTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House
Now just how did Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton get enough votes to win as the Minnesota House and Senate all went Republican?

Tom Horner.

27 posted on 04/09/2012 10:14:59 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (There will be no vote for Myth Romney in my house. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: olezip

“curbing same-day voter registration, absentee balloting and mail-in voting.”

In addition to preventing the dead and those who have moved from the state from voting, it would stop two of the three leading ways to commit vote fraud and in Minnesota would make some changes to the third (absentee voting) no one wants to eliminate legitimate absentee voting but some of the states have systems that are rife with fraud, apparently Minnesota is one of those.


28 posted on 04/09/2012 10:23:47 AM PDT by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Son House
curbing same-day voter registration, absentee balloting and mail-in voting.

All three should be shelved. Only mail in allowed should be military people overseas or stationed out of state.

That's just me

29 posted on 04/09/2012 11:27:19 AM PDT by hattend (Jesus wants me to make churches pay for abortions. - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

i remember seeing on here that in ‘08, SCOTUS ruled these laws were constitutional. If so, how can there be DOJ interference and so much contempt for them(rhetorical)?


30 posted on 04/09/2012 12:25:20 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: duffee

MN is also one of only 2 states to allow “vouching” for people...and you can do so for (IIRC) up to 15 people.

IE: “see those 15 people behind me in line? they’re all my neighbors and I vouch for them being legit to vote”


31 posted on 04/09/2012 12:54:03 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
It’s hard to imagine an honorable motive against insuring that the vote is legitimate.

Not hard, impossible.

32 posted on 04/09/2012 1:15:50 PM PDT by itsahoot (Tag lines are a waste of bandwidth, as are most of my comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
Haven't you heard, that was manufactured. </sarcasm>
33 posted on 04/09/2012 1:17:54 PM PDT by itsahoot (Tag lines are a waste of bandwidth, as are most of my comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Son House
The governor says he doesn't think there is a way to prevent it from going to voters.

IOW...he would stop the electorate from voting on it if he could. There is NOTHING democratic about democrats.
34 posted on 04/09/2012 1:18:43 PM PDT by rottndog (Be Prepared for what's coming AFTER America....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

But, hey! It’ll be voted either up or down using the old voting system, under which he was elected. So what’s he worried about?


35 posted on 04/09/2012 2:16:07 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

How did they manage to elect a Republican House and Senate? Could it be that certain areas of the state have an overwhelming turnout of democrats on election day? Minneapolis, St Paul, Rochester, Deluth?


36 posted on 04/09/2012 2:18:21 PM PDT by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

It’s my understanding that the Voter ID amendment is favored by a solid majority of voters in MN. Dayton has every reason to be worried enough to call his base to action in November.


37 posted on 04/09/2012 2:20:46 PM PDT by MNGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: duffee

St.Louis County


38 posted on 04/09/2012 2:30:10 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MNGal

Most MN polls are around 75% (in favor of Voter ID)

high is 80%, lowest I’ve seen is around 70%.


39 posted on 04/09/2012 2:45:40 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

I’ve never agreed with absentee or mail-in ballots. My father almost lost an election because of the fraud associated with the very loose protections around absentee ballots. It’s still the easiest way to buy votes, because you can be right there when the x is placed on the ballot and then sealed in the envelope. And that’s just with those voters who are legitimately on the voter list. The potential for abuse by imaginary or ineligible voters is even worse.


40 posted on 04/09/2012 3:51:50 PM PDT by littleharbour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson