[YoungBlackRepublican]

“Our Constitution was created to “promote the general welfare.” So a court that strikes down the health care law would not only shirk its constitutional responsibility, it would unduly injure the welfare of American women. “

There are so many things wrong with this statement it makes my head hurt. Liberals actually think like this.

[central_va]

Women are natural socialists. It is in their nature to want the collective to provide "services" that their possibly lame lazy husbands or baby daddies can't provide. Men don't understand how emotional this issue is for women. I certainly don't.

< broadbrush >

Men, for the most part, never need health care until they are old. Women of child bearing age are in need of health care, and have to care for children. Hello? The sexes are different. Their politics are different.

It's uterus politics vs. scrotum politics

< /broadbrush >

[DrC]

“So a court that strikes down the health care law would not only shirk its constitutional responsibility, it would unduly injure the welfare of American women. “

There are so many things wrong with this statement it makes my head hurt. Liberals actually think like this.”

Worse, this was written by someone who allegedly had legal training! I only had a few constitutional law classes in college, but apparently understand what the Constitution means (and doesn’t) than this bozo! Of course, her daddy wasn’t the box, so perhaps I’m being unfair...