Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bramps

Violent death in the US? It ain’t happening here. We wil; not put up with that BS. May be why this guy will dive into this issue of muslim filth. He knows he is safe. This is not the UK after all.


22 posted on 04/07/2012 9:42:31 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Lazlo in PA

I certainly hope you’re right.


24 posted on 04/07/2012 9:45:31 PM PDT by bramps (Newt is the one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Lazlo in PA

No, you are right, this is not UK but it is the USA; but I feel our people in high places [Senators, Congressmen, and even our President] are fearful of the Muslims, and rightly so.

But the worst of it all, they continue to appease them, this is not going to work. We must in everyway make them aware we are not in the least going to compromise the principles this nation was, and is founded upon.

As our founders stood upon: “Give me liberty or give me death.” [Patrick Henry]

“....and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.”
(2 Corinthians 2:17b)


25 posted on 04/07/2012 10:08:43 PM PDT by LetMarch (If a man knows the right way to live, and does not live it, there is no greater coward. (Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Lazlo in PA

Lazlo—Lazlo— Lazlo in PA How many honor killings—occur in the US? You believe the myth —if you believe “we will not put up with that BS.” That woman in Florida who was murdered -the press suggested she was killed because she was Muslim—what they ignored was it appears to have been a Muslim hit. An
honor killing. I suspect the Brits think -by listening to their media that they are safer there -than we are in America.
But that is just a swag.


41 posted on 04/08/2012 5:24:06 AM PDT by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Lazlo in PA

You might want to read this issue of Imprimus: http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis/archive/issue.asp?year=2012&month=02

It references a journalist from Seatle that is currently in hiding;

“The comedy show South Park refused to show an image of Mohammed in a bear suit, although it mocked figures from other religions. In response, Molly Norris, a cartoonist for the Seattle Weekly, suggested an “Everybody Draw Mohammed Day.” She quickly withdrew the suggestion and implied that she had been joking. But after several death threats, including from Al-Qaeda, the FBI advised her that she should go into hiding—which she has now done under a new name.”

Here is more meat:

snip
**************************
The second threat we face is the specter of cooperation between our government and the OIC to shape speech about Islam. A first indication of this came in President Obama’s Cairo speech in 2009, when he declared that he has a responsibility to “fight against negative stereotypes of Islam whenever they appear.” Then in July of last year in Istanbul, Secretary of State Clinton co-chaired—with the OIC—a “High-Level Meeting on Combating Religious Intolerance.” There, Mrs. Clinton announced another conference with the OIC, this one in Washington, to “exchange ideas” and discuss “implementation” measures our government might take to combat negative stereotyping of Islam. This would not restrict free speech, she said. But the mere fact of U.S. government partnership with the OIC is troublesome. Certainly it sends a dangerous signal, as suggested by the OIC’s Secretary-General, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, when he commented in Istanbul that the Obama administration stands “united” with the OIC on speech issues.

The OIC’s charter commits it “to combat defamation of Islam.” Its current action plan calls for “deterrent punishments” to counter “Islamophobia.” In 2009, an official OIC organ, the “International Islamic Fiqh [Jurisprudence] Academy,” issued fatwas calling for speech bans, including “international legislation,” to protect “the interests and values of [Islamic] society.” The OIC does not define what speech should be outlawed, but the repressive practices of its leading member states speak for themselves.

The conference Secretary Clinton announced in Istanbul was held in Washington on December 12-14, 2011, and was closed to the public, with the “Chatham House Rule” restricting the participants (this rule prohibits the identification of who says what, although general content is not confidential). Presentations reportedly focused on America’s deficiencies in its treatment of Muslims and stressed that the U.S. has something to learn in this regard from the other delegations—including Saudi Arabia, despite its ban on Christian churches, its repression of its Shiite population, its textbooks teaching that Jews should be killed, and the fact that it beheaded a woman for sorcery on the opening day of the conference.
*************************


62 posted on 04/09/2012 5:57:39 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Lazlo in PA
Violent death in the US? It ain’t happening here.

Your Black Muslim Bakery in Califoria murdered a journalist and others. It can happen here.

65 posted on 04/09/2012 8:17:16 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Barack Obama continued to sponsor Jeremiah Wright after he said "G.D. AMERIKKA!"Where's the outrage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson