George Soros has said that there is no difference between BHO2 and Romney.
One is a communist (Marxist-Leninist) and the other a fascist (national socialist). Both believe government is God and neither has any respect for the U.S.Constitution.
Neither gives a damn about the rights of individuals. The common man, or woman, on the street is just a “unit” to be taxed or obliterated, it matters not to them.
The last thing that either man wants is for Americans with Bibles and guns asserting their God-given rights and demanding that Washington, D.C., changes how it does business.
Obama is an atheist. He is only a Muslim or Christian when politically expedient. What he has done in North Africa is to destroy the westernized economies of those nations and set them back three hundred years. Those people will be starving during the next two to three years, resulting in plagues and massive upheaval, the perfect political scenario for imposing Marxism. Obama is evil, on that we both agree.
Romney and Wall Street are Globalists who care not a wit for American values. First and foremost, they see themselves as world citizens, responsible for maintaining peace and security world-wide through commerce. The role U.S. military plays is to maintain that global presence, project American military might, and provide security for international business under the guise of “U.S. national interests”.
Unfortunately, that military is paid for by tax revenue and staffed by the sons and daughters of people who no longer have jobs, as those have all been moved offshore by the above mentioned “world citizens” who want only money.
This election in 2012 is all about money, power, and who will eventually wield both here at home and internationally.
Gov.Mitt Romney is the candidate for the elitist Republicans who are, in essense, supporters of Globalism.
Wall Street’s business model is international in scope and must have security overseas in order for commerce to thrive. In an attempt to dominate international commerce AND the monetary structure, the U.S.A. must project military strength world wide. This has been neither conservative nor liberal in the past, both Democrats and Republicans have been involved over the decades, and our Congress quietly went along. Then Obama arrived on the scene when Democrats saw an opportunity to control all aspects of the U.S.government.
Obama is a Marxist. He’s all about Global Social Justice (communism) which means redistributing wealth and destroying the United States.
The choice we’re facing is quick and brutal destruction by Obama, or slow, sure destruction via by Romney.
It is easier to overhtrow the elitists in the Republican Party and Conservatives take the Party back from the fascists. That is the path we should take.
I doubt another opportunity will arise in the next two decades.
>>The choice we’re facing is quick and brutal destruction by Obama, or slow, sure destruction via by Romney.
The problem is more complicated. Technology has broken capitalism. I am an automation engineer. I put people out of work. I can take a process that used to require a dozen skilled or semi-skilled humans and reduce it to one or two barely literate machine operators who just monitor the machinery. How can you have a free market economy where human labor is cheapened like that?
Obama and Romney are both in favor of this because to the former, that means that people have to go on the dole to survive and to the latter, that means profits for the rich and nothing more for the dwindling working class than just enough money to survive. But, most people on FR are also in favor of this because they believe that all profits are for the shareholders. If we truly had a free market, I would make $300k+ a year or more because I replace 100 workers. But, the shareholder class has decided that even though I replace 100 workers, I am still just a worker and deserve a worker’s wage.
>>Neither gives a damn about the rights of individuals. The common man, or woman, on the street is just a “unit” to be taxed or obliterated, it matters not to them.
You say “taxed or obliterated”. I say that Obama wants us controlled via “subsidies” if we are poor or taxed harshly if we are rich. Romney wants us to serve our employers, if we have one, but only as temporary labor so that we can be retasked continuously to send massive profits to the top while the worker toils endlessly with no security other than the hope of a new boss tomorrow.
So, to me the economics of Romney vs Obama are moot. The only thing that matters is that Romney does not hate me for my skin color or religion or nationality, but Obama hates me for all three.