Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bryanw92
Romney is a national socialist, a fascist; please explain how that is better?

The Romneys donated about 16.4 percent of their adjusted gross income of $42.5 million in the two-year period, according to their 2010 tax returns and an estimate for 2011 taxes. Would a socialist give to charity and church like this?

Doubt it.

74 posted on 04/08/2012 10:52:38 AM PDT by alrea ("When justices veto legislative acts based on personal policy preferences, that's tyranny." M. Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: alrea

I didn’t call him a national socialist. I was just quoting another post. I was pointing out that a national socialist is preferable to an america-hating communist like Obama. I’m no a Romney fan, but this “Romney is the same as Obama” hysteria on FR is ridiculous. Obama represents the end of the US as we know it and his speeches and writings prove his intent, so anyone is better than him.

But, in answer to your question: yes, I think that a socialist with a strong sense of the “social gospel” would give 15% of his income to charity, especially his church. I know several very liberal Methodists who give freely to charity and directly to the poor and they far exceed any 10% tithe. A devout Mormon who gives 16% would not surprise me at all, regardless of his politics.


76 posted on 04/08/2012 11:42:03 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson