To: samantha
I will, thanks!
I edited plenty of audiotape in the late 70s while working for various radio stations, including an all-news station in Hartford. Of course, with a reel-to-reel and a splicing block, the physical process was very different than what’s done in the all-digital editing programs. But the mental process is the same, and if you’re working on the network level, you damn well better abide by the “measure-twice-cut-once” practice or you’re gone.
There is absolutely no way this was inadvertent. None.
155 posted on
04/06/2012 7:04:03 PM PDT by
bootless
(Never Forget. Never Again. (PursuingLiberty.com))
To: bootless
With digital editing, covering up the obvious edit would have been easy and quick.
I’m thinking the editor wanted to leave it in to alert people it was an edit.
156 posted on
04/06/2012 7:08:59 PM PDT by
Tex-Con-Man
(T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
To: bootless
This guy ZAMOST has to be involved, too many connections to NBC and CBS in Miami in Senior Investigative positions,and segue’ to CNN. there is not much info on him,but enough to look further an ask him questions.
157 posted on
04/06/2012 7:15:48 PM PDT by
samantha
( Sarah Palin TEAple leader to save America. Herman Cain & Santorum)
To: bootless
Absolutely! We owned a local cable news program for a while. One knows exactly what is being said while editing. THIS was no mistake! Editor knew immediately what final product said. It said what the editor decided he wanted it to say.
Do they think no one else has any experience with equipment? Many high school have audio/visual equipment for sport event use... all run by students.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson