Hey, newbie!
Posted on 04/06/2012 2:06:49 PM PDT by upchuck
As Mitt Romney assumes the role of presumptive Republican nominee, polls suggest a competitive general election matchup between the former Massachusetts governor and President Obama. Typically, both candidates poll in the mid-40s, while 10 to 12 percent remain uncommitted to either side.
Among these uncommitted voters, Rasmussen Reports polling shows that just 22 percent approve of the way the president is handling his job. Seventy-two percent (72 percent) disapprove. As for intensity, just 2 percent strongly approve, and 40 percent strongly disapprove.
At first glance, this seems like good news for Romney. These uncommitted voters will be difficult for the president to win over. But it raises another question: If these uncommitted voters are so unhappy with the president, why aren't they already Romney supporters?
The data suggest that voters are less than thrilled with the choices they'll have in November. The lack of enthusiasm for Romney among GOP voters has been well documented. Among Democrats, enthusiasm for their candidate is noticeably down, as well. Among young voters, for example, just 20 percent strongly approve of the job the president is doing.
Most young voters, of course, will still end up voting for the president just as most disgruntled Republicans will end up voting for Romney. But neither candidate connects well with white working-class voters. Romney has struggled to win over these voters in his primary contests, and Obama lost them to Hillary Clinton in the 2008 Democratic primaries. For many, Election 2012 is shaping up to be another choice between the lesser of two evils.
One reason can be found in the issue that stirred more political passion than any other over the past four years. The bailouts remain the most hated pieces of legislation in recent American history. They spurred both the tea party and the Occupy movements and convinced millions that a corrupt relationship exists between big government and big business. But both Romney and Obama are supporters of the bailouts. Given the public mood, it is almost beyond comprehension that neither party could come up with a presidential candidate opposed to the bailouts.
Looking ahead, most voters hear a lot of rhetoric about deficit reduction but don't believe either party has proposed a serious plan to stop ever-increasing government spending. Most don't even believe that the budget cuts agreed to during the debt ceiling debacle will ever be implemented. Politicians have spent years trying to blame voters for this problem, but my book "The People's Money" shows that voters are far more willing than their politicians to make the hard choices.
The disconnect can be found on other major issues, as well. On national security matters, GOP Congressman Paul Ryan's budget calls for cutting everything but defense spending, a position shared by just a third of voters. The president wants to trim the military budget but expand U.S. intervention into a growing list of countries. But 75 percent reject that approach and believe U.S. troops should be deployed abroad only when vital national security interests are at stake. Half of the nation's voters are even ready to follow President Eisenhower's advice and bring home U.S. troops from Western Europe and Japan.
There are certainly differences between Obama and Romney. People will find plenty of valid reasons to select one over the other. But if the winner of Election 2012 governs as he campaigns, the disconnect will continue, and voters will grow even angrier.
LLS
(To do otherwise is INSANITY!)>/i>
Oh no!
Insanity is making the same damn mistake over and over and expecting a different result!!
No more pulling a handle for a socialist pig even if they are the lesser pig.
All of my life and until my last breath... on my sacred honor.
LLS
Are you going to vote for Romney? A vote for Romney is a vote for Obama.
Right on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
LLS
Your knee-jerk bumper-sticker response confirms the shallow short-sightedness of your [lack of] thinking. You're all over what you're supposedly voting "against." The problem is, that the price of voting "against" your way is not worth what you would be voting for.
You have the nerve to voluntarily vote FOR a Republican who has, and would, sanction and defend:
-- Nationalized health care
-- Global warming cap-and-trade regulation
-- On-demand taxpayer funded abortion
-- Forced acceptance of open homosexuality throughout society, and punishment for resisting it
PROJECTION, FRiend -- Romney is the ONE Republican who would finalize your USSA. He is guaranteed to deliver Republican cooperation in promoting the most popular liberal causes that enslave Americans and create moral and fiscal decline -- and you have the nerve to berate me! LOLOL!!! {^)
Your Romney is tailor-made to for ushering in "The USSA, comarade!"
Hey, newbie!
The GOP-E should have gotten behind Palin instead of trying to destroy her!
Now they have a no good probable candidate going up against the second version of Jimmy Carter and they are sweating bullets.
They have only themselves to blame and I for one, hope all their big donations dry up for years to come.
Ditto, Friend.
the big media has played the republicant party like a fiddle.
So, at the end of the day IF IT’S ROMNEY AGAINST OBAMA, all true conservatives are to refrain from voting? I agree with ‘voting your conscience’ but if that mindset gives us four more years of 0bama, that’s INEXCUSABLE! There is absolutely NO WAY POSSIBLE that Romney would be the same as or worse than 0bama.. Romney would appoint SOME conservatives in various posts; THERE ARE CURRENTLY NONE. Think ‘administration’ in this election, not just the front man. We need REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION AND REPUBLICAN AGENCY HEADS, so vote for Romney FOR THIS REASON ALONE if you have to!
See, that is the point. Doesn't Matter if you vote For the Republican Candidate or the Democrat candidate you are getting an Obama. The only real difference between the two is one has a D after his name and isn't lying about how liberal he will be when he is elected.
Wow. There are so many falsehoods in your post I don't know where to start. Maybe, newbie, before posting such incredible bilge, you should hang around FreeRepublic for a while and educate yourself. [shakes head]
“Romney would appoint SOME conservatives in various posts;”
Wow... Words fail. Just needs to be repeated -
From a Mitt supporter:
“Romney would appoint SOME conservatives in various posts;”
This boy’s gotta be a RomneyBot. There’s no other explanation. Signs up a few weeks ago with the mission to propagandize to us stupid conservatives.
Now go play at the children's table.
These guys are crazy. They want to sell it like conservatives need a handout from the pubbies.
It’s the other way around and we’re not interested.
There has got to be a rule that says I am not supposed to laugh at that, but you flat put me on the floor with that response. LMAO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.