Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Daffynition

Looks pretty obvious to me that what is deemed “offensive” is the fact that the photographer used a brown-colored smiley-face.

If he had used a white or yellow smiley face, would we be hearing this hullaballoo? I think not.

Btw, according to article, the photographer said he was asked by the PTA to use a smiley face (as opposed to the originally proposed shape, a star). It wasn’t his idea.


13 posted on 04/06/2012 8:36:10 AM PDT by shhrubbery! (NIH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: shhrubbery!

Actually, the “outrage” would probably be even louder if the guy superimposed the usual white “smiley face”. “You made my son look white!!!” You can’t win with these people so in the words of Bette Midler, “F*** ‘em if they can’t take a joke”


33 posted on 04/06/2012 9:32:52 AM PDT by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: shhrubbery!
If he had used a white or yellow smiley face, would we be hearing this hullaballoo? I think not.

The kid's black, I think. If he'd used a white or yellow smiley face, Jesse Jackson would be involved by now.

38 posted on 04/06/2012 9:48:28 AM PDT by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: shhrubbery!

49 posted on 04/06/2012 10:58:39 AM PDT by Daffynition (Our forefathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson