Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver
On Tuesday, Obama said he meant the Supreme Court hadn’t overturned a law that involved the Commerce Clause, as the healthcare law does, in the last 80 years — since the New Deal.

Sure, if you ignore United States v. Morrison and United States v. Lopez.

31 posted on 04/04/2012 2:59:00 PM PDT by RagingBull (Talent does what it can; genius does what it must)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RagingBull
0bama only remembered Lockner v. Florida--which was a state law being overturned, hence, not really a good parallel at all--because Lockner dealt with the 14th Amendment, the only subject beyond Community Organizer 101 on which Zero lectured at the University of Chicago. (h/t Rush)

HF

58 posted on 04/04/2012 3:52:41 PM PDT by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson