Do these people REALLY believe this excrement they’re spewing?
Try it.
If you want war, you’ll have it.
The Supreme Court could easily retaliate against Obama by entertaining a challenge to his ‘qualifications’ to be President.
Impeach them if they don’t
This is soooooooooo FDR.
Nobody is impeaching anyone. Nor are they going to pass any “fix” or revamped version of Obamacare.
If the Supremes toss it out this issue will be D-E-A-D until the next time the Dems get super-duper majorities in both houses (which will hopefully be never)
“The problem with the current court is not merely that there is a good chance it will strike down a clearly constitutional law. “
I quit reading here. Such a statement shows he has zero understanding of the Constitution.
The Left used to wield the courts like a sword....I pray this horrible law gets over turned...
Impeach Zero!!!
What really burns me up about this article is how pretentious and knowledgeable he tries to sound...but he doesn’t even know that Jefferson tried to impeach Samuel Chase. Salmon Chase was Lincoln’s Secretary of Treasury. Pompous buffoon!
The writer is a driveling dork, but I think he's onto something here. . .
Right after we throw out the illegal alien sitting in the White House.
The problem with the current court is not merely that there is a good chance it will strike down a clearly constitutional law.
...before I realized the author is clearly FOS.
The car insurance canard. Yes, the mandate requires all people to pay, you don't have to have car insurance unless you want to drive. Good analogy. However, they still miss the point that the insurance requirements are a STATE level obligation - not a federal mandate. Pretty big distinction.
The second nonsense about requiring hospitals to treat everyone as the basis for mandate is another distraction.
I can't begin to address the core issues as well as the “unelected” justices did in their blistering examination of the brilliant Solicitor General. It is obvious the law should be reversed in total.
It won't, of course. I don't believe Robert's has the cajones to reverse this law.
I think Obama knows this and is ratcheting up the pressure, no matter how shrill it makes the One look. Stephens will concur with a 5-4 upholding the law. Then the left will love the Court again!
Did anyone inform this dumkopf, this trottel that the GOP controls the House and will probably regain control of the senate this Fall? And even were that not the case, can anyone here imagine a scenario where FIVE justices were impeached at the same time?!
Nowhere in the Constitution did it grant Congress the power to mandate anybody buy anything. And Jefferson once said something to the effect “If the government were to direct us
to plant wheat we should soon want for bread.” and elsewhere Jefferson said “to compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” IMO if the supreme Court FAILS to nullify ObamaCare they will have failed to honor their Oath of Office and ought be impeached.Obama’s health care reform is UNconstitutional root and stock.
"At the close of the Gilded Age, the U.S. infant mortality rate was around 10 percent—a number you find today in impoverished Central African nations. "
Which was the lowest infant mortality rate in U.S. history. It's completely unfair to compare a rate then to current rates, and what does that have to do with the court anyway. Besides you want a fair comparison, include abortion in the infant mortality rates. Is the court trying to raise the infant mortality rate? No. A red herring.
"Women could not vote, and their lives were controlled by men."
Again, That wasn't due to the court in the Gilded age, that was due to the founding fathers and all of western history that preceded them. Is the court trying to take away women's right to vote. No. A red herring.
"Blacks lived apart from whites and comprised an economic, social, and political underclass."
Again, what does that have to do with this court or the court in the Gilded Age. Nothing. A red herring.
"Corporations exerted an unchecked and deleterious influence on the lives of workers."
This is the only thing that the current court has actually touched on. And since the article doesn't expound on how times might be similar or what the court did or didn't do, it's a worthless article.
HA_HA, Mark Levin recommended some of those things in 2005 before the GWB appointees to the SCOTUS. The roles have flipped completely.
Men In Black:
How the Supreme Court is Destroying America
Author: Mark R. Levin
Publisher: Regnery
Date of Publication: February 2005
Levin's 2005 Men in Black (brief Sample and summary)
How about impeaching members of congress and the president for not upholding the constitution they’ve sworn to protect?
The constitution trumps federal statute. To make the mandate constitutional, you’d need an ammendment.
Nothing wrong w/the court pointing that out.