Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

the elena “I donts need to recuse” kegan leaked the supremes vote to the commie obama and he responded with threats and intimidation. It’s very simple what’s going on.


11 posted on 04/04/2012 5:35:43 AM PDT by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: biggredd1

can you believe the spineless republicans didn’t fight her nomination?

She defrauded the Supreme Court in 1996.
She is a criminal, and she will haunt us all for decades.


14 posted on 04/04/2012 5:39:29 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: biggredd1

Yes -
I’m very happy about all of the Leftists attacks on the court this week.

ESPECIALLY the style - the style of this attack is exactly what woul dpiss off a wobbly vote - FOR Obeymecare.

He may be an a** - but no way would he launch these attacks if he won.

In fact - these attacks are almost threats. The people have a case against him that any vote now is coerced.


18 posted on 04/04/2012 5:45:44 AM PDT by Eldon Tyrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: biggredd1; Kaslin

>> the elena “I donts need to recuse” kegan leaked the supremes vote to the commie obama and he responded with threats and intimidation

I see it differently.

Consider who on the court might actually be influenced by Barky’s dumb comment.

Not Alito, not Scalia, not Thomas, not Roberts. (Well, maybe in the negative: if, say, Roberts was sympathetic to the Government’s case, this threat would likely remove that sympathy).

Kennedy? Who know — who EVER knows about Kennedy. Who cares.

However, Sotemeyer, Kagan and Ginsburg are liberals, true, but they’re also liberal WOMEN who take their role AS PROFESSIONAL JURISTS VERY SERIOUSLY. They have huge egos and DO NOT want to be perceived as anyone’s reliable “lap dog”, especially not a male executive — not even Barack Obama.

Suppose any *one* of the three liberal women is at all convinced that the States’ position is the most righteous and defensible position from a legal (read: professional) point of view. To vote their liberal partisanship against their professional better judgment is OK as long as it’s perceive to be THEIR OWN (e.g. “WISE LATINA”) judgment.

But if they go partisan instead of righeous NOW, *after* Barky threatened them, it’ll be viewed by the outside world as being “pwned by a male”. Their female professional egos WILL NOT tolerate that!

If ANY ONE of them, as a consequence of Barky’s threat, votes with the conservative 4 to avoid being pwned by Barky, there’s your 5-4, REGARDLESS of how Kennedy votes.

That’s lots of conjecture, I agree. But I think this will backfire seriously badly on Boy President, and it *might* be the liberal women on the court who spank him. I think it could go 7-2 or even 8-1 against Barky.


37 posted on 04/04/2012 6:16:38 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: biggredd1

actually I think Elena “Boat Loads of Cash...” Kagan sounds better ;)


47 posted on 04/04/2012 6:35:50 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: biggredd1

Yes -
I’m very happy about all of the Leftists attacks on the court this week.

ESPECIALLY the style - the style of this attack is exactly what woul dpiss off a wobbly vote - FOR Obeymecare.

He may be an a** - but no way would he launch these attacks if he won.

In fact - these attacks are almost threats. The people have a case against him that any vote now is coerced.


66 posted on 04/04/2012 10:40:08 AM PDT by Eldon Tyrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson