I triple-dog-dare one journOlister to ask the President is he has EVER argued a case in ANY Court of law, not as a student, as a professional attorney. One case. Just one. Has he ever?
The answer is: no, he has not.
This whole contretemps reminds me of a curious finding by Stanley Kurtz, reported in his book "Radical-in-Chief".
Attempting to discover who Obama really was, Kurtz interviewed everybody he'd ever worked for. Seems that Obama never completed anything he started and left every job he ever had complaining of "not having enough power."
Having left one job, he then sought a post which would give him more power. That's why he went to Harvard, for example -- because a Harvard degree would allow him to accrue "more power."
The progression from community organizer to the State Senate, to the U.S. Senate to the Presidency was all a part of this quest for "more power."
From this, it is obvious that Obama's concept of "power" is childlike -- that of a juvenile's. In his mind, power isn't earned, persuasion and trust aren't integral to it. Instead, it is conferred by one's office.
To Obama, "power" is defined by making people do what you want them to do. All you have to do is issue a command. And, now, he inhabits the most powerful office in the free world. The "power" is his.
And he believes the SCOTUS should do his bidding. He has commanded them to do so. And he cannot conceive why they would deny him.
Of course, he will ignore their ruling!
This ignorant man-child is going to bring serious trouble down on all our heads.