[billva]

We have a SCOTUS which takes the Constitution seriously by a 1 vote margin, which is why I will be forced to vote for Romney in November instead of sitting out the election. I’m afraid the next POTUS may be able to nominate judges to SCOTUS and I sure as hell don’t want that POTUS to be the kenyan.

Thank you for stating what should be obvious to Conservatives but I am afraid that from many comments here doesn't sink in to some people.

[infowarrior]

Thank you for stating what should be obvious to Conservatives but I am afraid that from many comments here doesn't sink in to some people.

What is obvious to many of us, given Romney's track record of judicial appointments as governor of Massachusetts, is the *fact* that any SCOTUS appointent(s) he might make could very well be as bad, if not worse.

Has *that* sunk in to you yet?

the infowarrior

[supercat]

Thank you for stating what should be obvious to Conservatives but I am afraid that from many comments here doesn't sink in to some people.

If trends continue, the Supreme Court is going to issue some rulings which are so patently illegitimate that it will be necessary for people and state governments to openly denounce them as such and call upon people to ignore them. While it would be better for the Supreme Court to reverse direction rather than issuing such rulings, if that's not going to happen I'd rather a ruling come down as "4 conservative, 3 'legitimate' liberals, and 2 radicalist bozos who overtly denounce the Constitution", than "4 conservatives, 3 liberals, and 2 RINO appointees who back the liberals".