Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: billva
I am not trying to manipulate you but asking you a direct question is not manipulation.

Bullsquat! *YOU* never even bothered to answer *my* question at all, so you are being manipulative whether you choose to admit it, or not.

I'll put it to you this way, so you can possibly understand *exactly* where I'm coming from: Elections in this country are held by *secret* ballot, whether you like it, or not. My choice for president is *my* business, and most emphatically not that of K-Rove, Inc's. And, if you don't believe that K-Rove and Co aren't monitoring this forum, to see how their little game is going over, you are incredibly naive, are working for them, and thus no conservative, or both simultaneously. There is absolutely no way in h-ll I'm about to *publicly* commit to Romney where they could see it whether I plan on voting for him, or not.

Now, I've answered *your* question, will you have the common courtesy to answer mine, to wit: Given Romney's track record of judicial appointments as Governor of Massachusetts, and the GOP Senators long tradition of voting to affirm whoever *any* president desires to appoint to SCOTUS, do you really believe that his SCOTUS picks are a reason to discount his other *troublesome* qualities?

Take your time...

the infowarrior

35 posted on 04/04/2012 9:07:32 PM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: infowarrior
Bullsquat! *YOU* never even bothered to answer *my* question at all, so you are being manipulative whether you choose to admit it, or not.

I'll put it to you this way, so you can possibly understand *exactly* where I'm coming from: Elections in this country are held by *secret* ballot, whether you like it, or not. My choice for president is *my* business, and most emphatically not that of K-Rove, Inc's. And, if you don't believe that K-Rove and Co aren't monitoring this forum, to see how their little game is going over, you are incredibly naive, are working for them, and thus no conservative, or both simultaneously. There is absolutely no way in h-ll I'm about to *publicly* commit to Romney where they could see it whether I plan on voting for him, or not.

Now, I've answered *your* question, will you have the common courtesy to answer mine, to wit: Given Romney's track record of judicial appointments as Governor of Massachusetts, and the GOP Senators long tradition of voting to affirm whoever *any* president desires to appoint to SCOTUS, do you really believe that his SCOTUS picks are a reason to discount his other *troublesome* qualities?

Take your time...

the infowarrior

Misinfo warrior in your own words that is a Bullsquat answer

To the first part of your statement I didn't really expect or care if you answered the question. However from all your posts it seems you will be in the stay home and pout crowd, that includes this one.

Then you made a statement that you seemed to want to say you haven't made up your mind. So I asked you, your response pretty much speaks for it's self.

As to your question in the latter part of your post I will answer with two comments. First Romney's past actions trouble me but I certainly do believe people can evolve in their outlooks and I believe that with a Republican Congress Romney will act in accordance with what he is saying on the campaign trail.

Secondly I believe that when it comes to a choice between Obama and Romney it's a no brainer.

36 posted on 04/05/2012 4:18:13 AM PDT by billva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson