What answer have I posited? None... I merely raised a question, one that really needs to be examined.
The question is, "Given Romney's track record of judicial appointments while governor of Massachusetts, and the equally well-known fact that Senate Republicans have been essentially rubber-stamping SCOTUS picks which are questionable at best believing that the POTUS should have who he/she wants regardless of what it would mean for the posterity of the nation, how can we be so dead certain that what he would do, and what the Senate would subsequently rubber-stamp, would in any measure be superior?" I don't have an answer to that, do you?
As for anything else, you are making assumptions which are not necessarily valid. I've never stated here, or elsewhere, that I would not vote for Romney under any circumstances, and challenge you to demonstrate that I have done so, if you believe it. I'm not pouting, I'm asking legitimate questions, and I deeply resent your attitude, and crude attempts to manipulate, and herd me. I may well end up voting for Romney, and man I feel I can in no manner trust, but one thing you *can* be sure of, it won't be because of your pathetic tantrum here...
the infowarrior
The fact that you answered my post and they way you answered seemed to point that you weren't going to vote for Romeney
But after last night it should be obvious that he will be the nominee, so let me ask you the question
If Romney is the nominee will you vote for him?