Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pterional

FDR packed the court in the 30’s after failing in his try to expand the number of justices.


13 posted on 04/02/2012 6:47:46 PM PDT by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: research99
The scheme to expand the court to 12 from 9 was, in fact, the "court packing scheme".

He lost that battle in Congress.

Eventually the Justices he found troublesome retired or died leaving him free to appoint people more amenable to instruction ~ servile lackeys to a man.

If the Supreme Court were reduced to just one member, the Chief Justice, we'd have a top administrative/legal structure highly representative of the ancient Roman system of TWO TRIBUNES, except their's was a bit more complex and less responsive to changing conditions ~ almost let Hannibal conquer Rome in fact.

So much for the wisdom of the founders ~ we still don't have the Executive/Judicial interface just right. Permanancy in office didn't really make the judges independent ~ just allowed them to be more partisan.

46 posted on 04/02/2012 8:02:36 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: research99

FDR packed the court in the 30’s after failing in his try to expand the number of justices.

FDR tried to by appointing 3 more judges to the court, but even the Speaker of the House(DEM) was appalled. I had to laugh when Bush 43 was accused by the Democraps of “packing the court” ,when he was only exercising his right to fill a vacancy.


63 posted on 04/02/2012 9:48:49 PM PDT by RightLady (Liberty above all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson