Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

Watch. I predict an indictment. The question of whether he is innocent or guilty isn’t decided at this stage. That’s for trial. The only question is whether there is enough evidence to file charges. And that is largely a matter of what the prosecutor (Corey) thinks. Then they will have a preliminary hearing at which the judge will have to decide if there is probable cause. He might dismiss it at that point, but I would say even that is unlikely. There is going to be tremendous pressure to put this off onto a jury. The only way I can see it not getting to a jury is if he makes a plea, and even then the prosecution would probably not accept it unless Martin’s family agrees.


71 posted on 04/02/2012 5:56:50 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Brilliant
-- Watch. I predict an indictment. --

That's different from your previous "I think there is enough evidence to indict." which is what I was responding to.

Your remarks didn't address the evidence, just the politics, and the process, in general terms.

No evidence that Wolfinger met with or spoke with Sanford police? None? Well then, what's to discuss. Wolfinger's denial then covers EVERY point in Crump's accusatory letter, and there is no reason for confusion.

77 posted on 04/02/2012 6:10:04 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson