The story contradicts Zimmerman. Obvious Troll is obvious.
Funeral director in black community backs the party line that TM didn’t start fight - no bruising on hands.
1. Medical explanation posted above.
2. What else would he say?
One news story outed the 14 year old witness and now the Mom is trying to change her son’s story.
Death threats. Bounties. President convicting Zimmerman.
The “high tech lynching” is all but complete.
If the aggressor in a fight throws a first punch that is a sucker punch that puts someone down on the ground, the agressor is not going to be injured.
If the next action of the aggressor is to take hold of the person’s head and bang it on the pavement, the aggressor is also not going to show any signs of injury.
Somebody tell me what I am missing, how the funeral director’s statement is in any way relevant.
Little known fact.
The only thing more segregated than churches in the USA is funeral homes.
I kept hearing people cite the funeral director as an impartial source of information. In my town there is a black-owned funeral home and they seem to handle most if not all of the funerals of black people...so I figured Trayvon’s parents would probably have had a black funeral home involved. From the photo that looks like it is the case—so he’s not going to say anything that will hurt the story line of Trayvon Martin as the innocent victim.
wrong, it is an undeniable fact at this point zimmerman had broken skin on the back of his head and a bloody nose. the libs defeated themselves on this one, no bruising on TM's body shows the fight was all one sided. Clearly self defense on Zimmerman's part.
>> “Funeral director in black community backs the party line that TM didn’t start fight - no bruising on hands.” <<
.
Hands, and particularly knuckles, do not normally bruise that easily. I suspect that you’re misreading this. A mortician would know that his knuckles wouldn’t be bruised unless he had been hitting hard, abrasive objects.