The family said he went to 7-Eleven and the other places are still quite some distance away. The closest is a couple miles and all are across a busy highway IIRC. It was supposedly raining, too. Someone must have really had the jones for some candy and tea to go to all that trouble. Or was skittles and AZ tea, as another FReeper pointed out, street names for drugs and he was hiding them in his waistband when he approached Z? I still want to know what was in his waistband and where the candy and drink were during the incident. We know he had cell phone because he was talking to his gf and supposedly he had wallet to purchase said items so those filled up his pockets to some extent. The hoodie could have held the items but we’ve heard nothing about them being in police custody so do they really exist or is this yet another lie to make him the innocent angel. Besides, was was supposed to have been grounded but then dad says (the story flip flops) he let him go but dad was clueless of anything until later the next day when he thought since he couldn’t find him that he’d been arrested. Really? So, does the little angel have a habit of getting hauled in? Then there’s the question of if the police did or didn’t check M’s cell phone for “dad’s cell” to notify the family and surely he’d have noticed all the lights and commotion when he came in from his date so what was dad doing all night? I was grounded half my childhood and I’ve grounded my own kids and this doesn’t sound like any grounding I’ve ever heard of, but then I never walked more than a couple blocks for candy and never bashed anyone’s head into the ground. Sorry, but M’s side makes less sense every hour whereas Z’s side does more and more.
Maybe evidence was put in trunk to be logged asap. Unlike the yakkity yak funeral director, I don't think police have mentioned what was in the trunk.
May have been nothing at all related. Or, maybe so.