The specificity of your argument is far more eloquent proof of how badly you would be hammered in the court system than anything I would feel moved to spend precious time composing in responding to you.
I spent 25 years practicing law, including constitutional law before retiring. I am betting you have not spent a day as a lawyer. OK, contact this Attorney D'Onofrio, hire him, spend your hard-earned money on his fantasies and watch him go down in flames. Has he EVER tested his own fantasies in court on the subject? IF he is still practicing and has ever been competent, he KNOWS he will not be charged with treason although he may be financially sanctioned for bringing a frivolous lawsuit under federal court rules. Best he embarrass himself in some state court which would be more charitable to him unless he insists on ignoring all the rulings on the subject that have already been entered by courts state and federal after losing a few of his own.
REST WELL!!!!
You really are a shill, aren't you. Anything that rocks the liberal boat and there you seem to be with a seemingly rational argument...until it's dissected.
And you pretend to not recognize to whom the treason charge was being levied. You turn it around to where you imply the charge is a self accusation upon the poster instead of on the POTUS as was obviously the intent.
I spent 25 years practicing law, including constitutional law before retiring.
REALLY! Somehow I don't believe you.
Post under your real name then, it'll give you more credibility.
Anyone can be anything under a pen name/screen name.