[101stAirborneVet]

You’re the one making the baseless assertion that Zimmerman received “special treatment” by having a felony charge reduced to a misdemeanor charge and then receiving a diversion sentence. Since you’re the one making the claim, you’re the one who must provide evidence. Just to be nice, though, I have proven that there was nothing “special” done at all. Such results are commonplace in that county’s court system.

[Rooivalk]

You’re the one making the baseless assertion that Zimmerman received “special treatment” by having a felony charge reduced to a misdemeanor charge and then receiving a diversion sentence. Since you’re the one making the claim, you’re the one who must provide evidence. Just to be nice, though, I have proven that there was nothing “special” done at all. Such results are commonplace in that county’s court system.

Frankly I do not know why Zimmerman got off light. Like you I can only speculate.

However we do know that Zimmerman overstepped his authority as a Neighborhood Watch and confronted Martin outside of his truck and that led to the shooting

And no amount of wiggling and twisting has changed those facts

Zimmerman had NO cause to leave his truck. He had observed NO CRIME being committed. Yet he decided in his own mind to step out of his truck and pursue Martin.

I have asked others who support Zimmerman to explain his actions. Can you do it?

Since Zimmerman had OBSERVED no crime in progress, on what authority did he have to pursue? Was Zimmerman a mindreader and figured that Martin would commit a crime at some future date? What?