Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rockingham
However true, therefore, it may be, that the judicial department is, in all questions submitted to it by the forms of the Constitution, to decide in the last resort, this resort must necessarily be deemed the last in relation to the authorities of the other departments of the government; not in relation to the rights of the parties to the constitutional compact, from which the judicial, as well as the other departments, hold their delegated trusts. On any other hypothesis, the delegation of judicial power would annul the authority delegating it; and the concurrence of this department with the others in usurped powers, might subvert forever, and beyond the possible reach of any rightful remedy, the very Constitution which all were instituted to preserve.
James Madison, Report on the Virginia Resolutions

----

The Supreme Court was to decide what constitutional for the other branches of the federal government, not what is constitutional for the States.

33 posted on 04/01/2012 5:43:44 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a ~Person~ as created by the Law of Nature, not a 'person' as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: MamaTexan

The line of thinking — nullification — is simply unworkable because it would permit states to opt out of the Constitution when they pleased.


45 posted on 04/01/2012 1:09:14 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson