Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ravager

Number 3 ‘’Muslim’’. A hat-tip to my Crusader ancestors. I didn’t say “Saracen’’ ‘’ meant a Pakistani so twist the issue. Indians fighting Pakis with Russian made crap is a lot different from any other country fighting American made systems manned by Americans. Seems to me you’re the one with a ‘’retarded’’ world view.


73 posted on 04/02/2012 2:43:43 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: jmacusa
The number 3 definition doesn't just stop at “Muslim”. In fact most Pakistanis weren't even Muslims during the Crusades. Pakistanis are more recent converts.

The word “Saracen” in most common usage denotes an Arab from the time of the Crusades....regardless of whatever way you want to twist or stretch the definition.

The point is ......when Americans fight with American weaponry and with overwhelming military superiority against puny enemies it is not really a good example where you can judge the relative superiority of one equipment over the other.......hence your retarded world view.......which more then one poster on this thread tried to fix and failed.

Seems to me you’re the one with a ‘’retarded’’ world view.”

The key phrase being....”Seems to me”

74 posted on 04/02/2012 3:24:00 PM PDT by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: jmacusa

And lastly the Crusades was the one time when the “Saracens” actually kicked butts.


75 posted on 04/02/2012 3:25:54 PM PDT by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson