Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

International Debut for the Russian T-90MS Tank Upgrade at DefExpo 2012
Defense Update ^ | March 29, 2012 | Binny Winson

Posted on 03/29/2012 9:23:35 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: cunning_fish

If you mean “Russian’’, whom are you talking about? The roughly 65% of the population who are Caucasian, as I mean? I doubt very much the other 35% feel about “Rodina’’ as the typical “Ivan’’ does. Stalin saw to that.


61 posted on 04/02/2012 9:22:25 AM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

I think most of the population are still identify themself to Russians, no matter what ethnicity they are. It is in American interest to keep this way. Russia is a natural ally.
They are a sole superpower of the time who has supported US independence. They were the most valuable ally against nazism and they are the most valuable ally against islam and China.
We have to leave his stupid zero sum game, it is not in an interest of both nations.


62 posted on 04/02/2012 9:34:57 AM PDT by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: cunning_fish; jmacusa

When comparing American and Russian weaponry, Americans always love to talk about Iraq war which was totally one sided, but never talk about India-Pakistan war which was more or less evenly matched and American weaponry got absolutely wasted.


63 posted on 04/02/2012 10:38:15 AM PDT by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: cunning_fish

The best Soviet military hardware has always yet to be proven in battle.


64 posted on 04/02/2012 10:47:35 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious that they are trying hard to ignore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ravager
Pakistan is a recent creation, a country made up entirely of Saracens not particularly known for their fighting spirit. The Saracens believe in a rather haphazard training style believing that at the appropriate time in battle Allah will reveal himself and guide them to victory. The Indian Army is a different story. India is an ancient culture with a long history of fierce warriors combined with a modern history of learning modern combat techniques from the Brits.
65 posted on 04/02/2012 1:39:06 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: cunning_fish

Natural ally!?! What freakin’ planet are you living on? Russia was an ally’’ in WW2 only by circumstance. Don’t forget that up until June of ‘41 they were allies of Nazi Germany.’ They were our ‘’natural ally’’ during fifty years of the Cold War? Ally’’ my foot. Putin and a long line of Russkie commies did all they could to put an end to us. ‘’Ally’’. What a joke. Didn’t you catch Obamas ‘’open mike’’ gaff? That little Marxist s.o.b. is getting ready to sell us out to our ‘’ally’’.


66 posted on 04/02/2012 1:46:46 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
Pakistanis and Indians are mostly of the same racial/ethnic stock. Saracens are Arabs. Pakistanis are not Arabs.... not even Persians or Turks. India and Pakistan shared the same civilization/culture and British influence. And in 1964 and 1971 Pakistanis were trained by US/UK had assistance from US military advisers...... they still lost. Disastrously!
67 posted on 04/02/2012 2:04:32 PM PDT by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

I take it, you never read anything about India-Pakistan wars.


68 posted on 04/02/2012 2:06:31 PM PDT by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ravager

Look up the definition of a “Saracen’’. Having the will to fight is a motivating factor in winning a war. Whats the sub-text you’re trying to get across pal, you got a soft spot for the Russkies?


69 posted on 04/02/2012 2:11:11 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ravager

Look up the definition of a “Saracen’’. Having the will to fight is a motivating factor in winning a war. Whats the sub-text you’re trying to get across pal, you got a soft spot for the Russkies?


70 posted on 04/02/2012 2:12:19 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

Sar·a·cen Show Spelled[sar-uh-suhn] Show IPA
noun
1. History/Historical . a member of any of the nomadic tribes on the Syrian borders of the Roman Empire.

2. (in later use) an Arab.

3. a Muslim, especially in the period of the Crusades.
adjective

4. Also, Sar·a·cen·ic Show Spelled[sar-uh-sen-ik] Show IPA, Sar·a·cen·i·cal. of or pertaining to the Saracens.


71 posted on 04/02/2012 2:31:50 PM PDT by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
I did look up the definition of Saracen. I didnt see any of the definition applying to Pakistan. Why dont you explain what's your definition of Saracen.

Dunno about “soft spot”. I just dont share your retarded world view that every Russian weaponry is piece of scrap metal. Indians using Russian “scrap metal” have kicked Pakistani butt along with their hi-tech American weaponry.

72 posted on 04/02/2012 2:36:42 PM PDT by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ravager

Number 3 ‘’Muslim’’. A hat-tip to my Crusader ancestors. I didn’t say “Saracen’’ ‘’ meant a Pakistani so twist the issue. Indians fighting Pakis with Russian made crap is a lot different from any other country fighting American made systems manned by Americans. Seems to me you’re the one with a ‘’retarded’’ world view.


73 posted on 04/02/2012 2:43:43 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
The number 3 definition doesn't just stop at “Muslim”. In fact most Pakistanis weren't even Muslims during the Crusades. Pakistanis are more recent converts.

The word “Saracen” in most common usage denotes an Arab from the time of the Crusades....regardless of whatever way you want to twist or stretch the definition.

The point is ......when Americans fight with American weaponry and with overwhelming military superiority against puny enemies it is not really a good example where you can judge the relative superiority of one equipment over the other.......hence your retarded world view.......which more then one poster on this thread tried to fix and failed.

Seems to me you’re the one with a ‘’retarded’’ world view.”

The key phrase being....”Seems to me”

74 posted on 04/02/2012 3:24:00 PM PDT by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

And lastly the Crusades was the one time when the “Saracens” actually kicked butts.


75 posted on 04/02/2012 3:25:54 PM PDT by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

>>>>>>>>>>>>>Natural ally!?! What freakin’ planet are you living on? Russia was an ally’’ in WW2 only by circumstance. Don’t forget that up until June of ‘41 they were allies of Nazi Germany.’ They were our ‘’natural ally’’ during fifty years of the Cold War? Ally’’ my foot. Putin and a long line of Russkie commies did all they could to put an end to us. ‘’Ally’’. What a joke. Didn’t you catch Obamas ‘’open mike’’ gaff? That little Marxist s.o.b. is getting ready to sell us out to our ‘’ally’’.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

To bring things into perspective you have to note Russians has backed Spanish Republicans against nazy-socialist element backed by Germans during Spanish Civil War. It was one bloody war in ‘30s with Russians and Germans involved from both sides. And prior to ‘39 Russians were seeking French-British alliance to take on nazy. Neither British nor French agreed to take on Hitler and paid for thet later. Soviets and Hitler weren’t allies by definition. It was a non-agression pact. Initially Russians took over Poland, Baltic states and Moldova as a buffer zone against Germans.

And as for a Cold War it was a pretty little episode in terms of long human history.

The majority of Russians hates communism right now, they are white Christian nation with a lot of interests corelated to US interests. A few other major nations like that left.

It is pretty enough to be a good alliance to me instead of playing zero sum games from both sides.


76 posted on 04/02/2012 7:28:57 PM PDT by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ravager

They did until they were defeated. Check out Charles Martel and Vlad Tepes,aka “Vlad the Impaler’’. Got a soft spot for them too, eh? You may have noted but this is not a Saracen-friendly web-site. What ails you dude? You’re contrary to just about everything I say.


77 posted on 04/02/2012 7:40:37 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: cunning_fish

Pal, you’ve sure got some screwy version of history. The “Cold War’’ was a ‘’pretty little episode in human history’’. You mean in duration of time? Yeah, sure, ok. Fifty freakin’ years. Right. Let me guess, you’re Russian?


78 posted on 04/02/2012 7:44:26 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: ravager

A Saracen is a Muslim. Pakistan did not exist during the time of the Crusades.


79 posted on 04/02/2012 7:51:21 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ravager

Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan weren’t ‘’puny enemies’’. You got some problem with America or what?


80 posted on 04/02/2012 7:54:06 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson