Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tomkat

So, am I correct in saying that this means that the officer on scene never indicated in any paperwork that he thought Z. should be arrested?


20 posted on 03/29/2012 6:34:02 AM PDT by Clara Lou (ABO! Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Clara Lou
-- am I correct in saying that this means that the officer on scene never indicated in any paperwork that he thought Z. should be arrested? --

That's correct. There is a slot in the form that has to filled in. it describes what is being investigated, not that the infraction being investigated took place. It's a "neutral" entry as far as conclusions go.

22 posted on 03/29/2012 6:44:52 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou
So, am I correct in saying that this means that the officer on scene never indicated in any paperwork that he thought Z. should be arrested?

Absent an official clarification to the contrary, one would reasonably conclude that to be the case.

A reporter stated that based on the description of the incident on the report, that the officer on scene wished to have Mr. Zimmerman arrested and charged with the “Uniform Crime Code” listed on the report. That is not accurate.   (emphasis mine)

Source

23 posted on 03/29/2012 6:50:22 AM PDT by tomkat ( FU.baraq !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson