If there is any aspect of it that is likely to be a criminal conspiracy it is the manner in which Hawaii apparently registers births which occur outside of it's borders as having occurred in Hawaii. Did you see this chart? (The Daily Pen does some very good work)
Apparently Hawaii is pretty lenient with it's requirements to register a birth there. Not necessarily a criminal conspiracy, but it might be.
YOU have a legally altered BC, not a forged pdf image of a BC. There is no HI statute under which a pdf would be forged to simulate a 1961 LFBC, and in no case would a legal adoption result in the birth location being moved from Kenya to HI, for example.
I have always operated on the assumption that Hawaii possesses SOME sort of document registering his birth in August of 1961. I have long speculated that this document was likely an affidavit of "at home birth" which was filed by his Grandmother, Madelyn Dunham. Even if he had been born in Kenya (Which I very much doubt) the officials in the Hawaiian registrar's office can hardly be held accountable if they were lied to by a member of a child's family.
Hawaiian law DOES allow someone to register an "at home birth" as having occurred in Hawaii, so if Obama was born in Kenya (again, I highly doubt it,) or Washington State, or Canada, or wherever, an affidavit of home birth would still result in a "record" which CLAIMS birth in Hawaii.
If Obama got his previous adoptions annulled, then he could use the data claimed on his original birth record as the basis for generating a new replacement birth certificate, which nowadays would be pasted together by the Hawaiian DOH out of the database of records which they currently possess.
I ask you, who else has access to all the right sources of data needed to create such a document? The Hawaiian DOH creates replacement birth certificates for any child that gets adopted in Hawaii routinely. The documents they produce only need to pass a cursory inspection, they don't have to be perfect because most people aren't going to scrutinize them once they see the official seal.
The Stuff a DOH produces was never intended to survive the sort of scrutiny which Obama's document has been subjected to, and that is why it was quickly recognized as a fake. It also gives us the answer to one of the questions that so many people have been asking.
"If this is a forgery, why did they do such a poor job of it? You would think Obama could afford to hire professionals to do the job right. "
Again, the DOH produces replacement birth certificates, but they don't expect them to be scrutinized to the extent this one was.