Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP-run House easily rejects Obama budget (REJECTED!)
Fox News ^ | 3/28/2012 | AP

Posted on 03/28/2012 7:11:00 PM PDT by tobyhill

The Republican-run House has overwhelmingly rejected President Obama's $3.6 trillion budget for next year after a vote forced by GOP lawmakers to embarrass Democrats.

Republicans have opposed Obama's budget all year, criticizing its tax increases on the wealthy and saying it lacks sufficient spending cuts.

Democrats have defended Obama's budget priorities, but they largely voted "no" Wednesday night.

,,,,

The vote was 414-0.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: tobyhill

Largely? More like overwhelmingly unanimous it would seem.


21 posted on 03/28/2012 7:55:08 PM PDT by kalee (The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we engrave in marble. J Huett 1658)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

22 posted on 03/28/2012 7:59:06 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The 382-38 roll call paved the way for Republicans to muscle through their own, more stringent budget on Thursday


23 posted on 03/28/2012 7:59:50 PM PDT by evad (STOP SPENDING, STOP SPENDING, STOP SPENDING. It's the SPENDING Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cornelis

Election year?

Of course he sent a bill to the House. Now Republicans can’t say that Obama has sent them a bill. He is sleazy. He has just knocked out a pretty good part of the Republicans negative of Obama that he never sent a bill to the House....UGH!!!! Dang him.


24 posted on 03/28/2012 8:02:54 PM PDT by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

And the republicans can remind him, ‘oh, that bill...the one everybody in your own party rejected’.


25 posted on 03/28/2012 8:08:51 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
If I may, how does having a Floor Vote on a Budget the Democrat President submitted embarrass his own Party?

Is it because that same President really is an embarrassment to his own Party and the Budget he submitted only proves the point?

26 posted on 03/28/2012 8:09:36 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (A day without Obama is like a day without a Tsunami.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Largely? I’d say it was unanimously!


27 posted on 03/28/2012 8:10:03 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George from New England
yup... worse than the Little Big Horn
28 posted on 03/28/2012 8:11:02 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Democrats have defended Obama's budget priorities, but they largely voted "no" Wednesday night.

414-0 and they say 'largely voted no'?

I despair for journalism in this country.

29 posted on 03/28/2012 8:12:52 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Myth Romney: "Governor Goodhair" is really just a Whig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks tobyhill.
Democrats have defended Obama's budget priorities, but they largely voted "no" Wednesday night.
And THAT is the buried lead. Thanks AP, nice of Fox to use your line of partisan bull instead of covering it in person.


30 posted on 03/28/2012 8:29:27 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
FOX’s new title is “tactical vote” whatever the heck that means?
31 posted on 03/28/2012 8:35:58 PM PDT by tobyhill (Fight Fire With Fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

How appropriate—ZERO for ZERO.


32 posted on 03/28/2012 8:41:13 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
414-0!

Obama taken to the woodshed!


33 posted on 03/28/2012 8:47:03 PM PDT by massmike (Massachusetts: If they had just kept hanging witches a bit longer...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Wake up. Revenue bills originate in the House so the president is Supposed to send a budget to the House. Obama finally did the right thing. It is up to the House to pass a budget (which they have) and send it to the Senate and up to the Senate to take up the budget bill.
34 posted on 03/28/2012 9:08:34 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
BFD - now the GOP need to start DEFUNDING this RAT madness and do NOT raise the Debt Ceiling - make Zero take the fall if the bond market goes berserk. The Feds have plenty of cash coming in monthly to meet ALL the needs of paying interest on US Bonds and T-Bills. There will only be a default if Zero chooses to default - treasonous. The tough part for Zero is that he will be forced to cut his social utopia programs if he does not have the ability to borrow more cash OR he will just ignore Congress and the Constitution just like he proposed to do back in The Debt Ceiling: Why Obama Should Just Ignore It , June 2011
35 posted on 03/28/2012 9:11:46 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
None of the 21 wanted to be the laughing stock of congress.

That's it! And didn't want their names out there for election purposes. Self serving *&%!@^"$.

ROMNEYCARE is the blueprint for obamacare and Romney loves his Romneycare for others while he doesn't use it. He will start it all over again - national healthcare! He cannot get in!!

36 posted on 03/28/2012 9:28:03 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
He has just knocked out a pretty good part of the Republicans negative of Obama

VERY dumb statement. And besides that, you don't hide it well.

37 posted on 03/28/2012 9:40:16 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Hooray for bipartisanship!


38 posted on 03/28/2012 9:55:22 PM PDT by MichaelNewton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; ...


Finally, bipartisanship?

but the article begins with:
The Republican-run House has overwhelmingly rejected President Obama's $3.6 trillion budget...

The vote was 414-0.



39 posted on 03/29/2012 12:01:11 AM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

Going down?

40 posted on 03/29/2012 12:14:34 AM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson