To: brownsfan
"But that will have to wait until January, 2017."
If we lose and BHO gets his second term, we may not see any future elections.
31 posted on
03/28/2012 8:25:35 AM PDT by
FortWorthPatriot
(Obama is no Hitler; Hitler got the Olympics)
To: FortWorthPatriot
If we lose and BHO gets his second term, we may not see any future elections.I heard this same crap back when Clinton was running for re-election....DUmmies said the same thing about Bush.
Better to lose, and control Congress, and have a better GOP candidate for 2016, than to have Romney win, and not have a decent Republican candidate for 2016.
33 posted on
03/28/2012 8:29:19 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
To: FortWorthPatriot
If we lose and BHO gets his second term, we may not see any future elections. Outside of the Republic of Texas, that may well be the case.
37 posted on
03/28/2012 8:34:22 AM PDT by
Charles Martel
(Endeavor to persevere...)
To: FortWorthPatriot
*** If we lose and BHO gets his second term, we may not see any future elections. ***
How can that be? I’m told over and over again here at FR that a second Obama term is far preferable to electing Romney.
The die is cast, Romney vs. Obama. With so many staying home, guess it will be Obama.
That’s better, right?
41 posted on
03/28/2012 8:40:38 AM PDT by
brownsfan
(Aldous Huxley and Mike Judge were right.)
To: FortWorthPatriot
There will be future elections.
But there will be only one candidate on the ballot.
83 posted on
03/28/2012 1:17:22 PM PDT by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson