Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Navy Patriot
"Although most of your post is correct, this is not legally accurate, although I understand your meaning."

If the police know there are credible threats to the life and safety of Zimmerman, aren't they required to eliminate those threats? I would say that a wanted poster with my picture on it, along with a price on my head equals a credible threat.

33 posted on 03/27/2012 12:22:26 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: mass55th
If the police know there are credible threats to the life and safety of Zimmerman, aren't they required to eliminate those threats?

By law, No.

The police MAY offer protection, but there is no legal requirement for them to do so, and no legal consequences for failing to protect you from any harm.

34 posted on 03/27/2012 12:29:57 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it. (plagiarized))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: mass55th
If the police know there are credible threats to the life and safety of Zimmerman, aren't they required to eliminate those threats?

Is there any evidence that the people putting out the wanted posters are in the jurisdiction of the Sanford police department?

Realistically, the police don't even have a legal responsibility not to pull their squad cars out of an area where a riot is going on. There may be political consequences to doing so, but no court will ever hold them liable.

35 posted on 03/27/2012 12:31:01 PM PDT by Wissa (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson