Is a matter of policy is the same as a violation of protocols?
It is not a "law" but it is 100% clear: patrol members are not carry weapons, have no police power, and should not attempt to apprehend a person committing a crime or to investigate a suspicious activity. Not following the guidelines can result in serious consequences: each member is liable as an individual for civil and criminal charges should he exceed his authority.
It is not a "law" but it is 100% clear: patrol members are not carry weapons, have no police power, and should not attempt to apprehend a person committing a crime or to investigate a suspicious activity."
Well it is just that - protocol, there is no force of law behind the stated protocol no matter how clearly it is stated. I take that as more or less a policy the watch group takes out to attempt to protect themselves from being sued in an event such as this.
"Not following the guidelines can result in serious consequences: each member is liable as an individual for civil and criminal charges should he exceed his authority."
Anytime someone uses a gun against another human they are almost always personally liable for civil and criminal charges so this part of the policy is IMHO, just restating what should be obvious to anyone who carries a weapon.