Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alancarp

SCOTUSblog:
Argument is done. Gov’t has a shot at Kennedy, Alito, and Roberts. But no clear fifth vote. All commerce, no tax power.

sarahkliff:
MT @SCOTUSblog: Update: Paul Clement gave the best argument I’ve ever heard. No real hard questions from the right. Mandate is in trouble.


123 posted on 03/27/2012 9:11:00 AM PDT by alancarp (Liberals are all for shared pain... until they're included in the pain group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: alancarp
ShannonBream: SCOTUS: plenty of q's from J Kennedy - 1st - how does my failure to purchase something make me subject to regulation? Janet Adamy @janetadamy #supremecourt WSJ's Kendall Verrilli shifts to another part of his argument: that insurance mandate is permissible under gov's tax authority janetadamy: #supremecourt WSJ's Kendall: This argument hits resistance. Kagan noted the determined efforts of Congress not to label the penalties a tax. #supremecourt WSJ''s Kendall: Scalia said, The president said it wasn't a tax, didn't he? Garrett Love ‏ @Garrett_Love RT @KansasSitySinic: "Every question Kennedy asked seemed skeptical of the law." -CNN #healthcare #SupremeCourt Avik Roy: latest from SCOTUSblog: A quick update from the steps. Towards the end of the argument the most important question was Justice Kennedy’s. After pressing the government with great questions Kennedy raised the possibility that the plaintiffs were right that the mandate was a unique effort to force people into commerce to subsidize health insurance but the insurance market may be unique enough to justify that unusual treatment. But he didn’t overtly embrace that. It will be close. Very close.
125 posted on 03/27/2012 9:17:50 AM PDT by alancarp (Liberals are all for shared pain... until they're included in the pain group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

What was Paul Clement’s argument, should you have the time?


126 posted on 03/27/2012 9:18:09 AM PDT by Chgogal (WSJ, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp
Arrgggg.... i'll try that last one again:

SCOTUS: plenty of q's from J Kennedy - 1st - how does my failure to purchase something make me subject to regulation?

Janet Adamy @janetadamy #supremecourt WSJ's Kendall Verrilli shifts to another part of his argument: that insurance mandate is permissible under gov's tax authority

janetadamy: #supremecourt WSJ's Kendall: This argument hits resistance. Kagan noted the determined efforts of Congress not to label the penalties a tax.

#supremecourt WSJ''s Kendall: Scalia said, The president said it wasn't a tax, didn't he?

Garrett Love ‏ @Garrett_Love RT @KansasSitySinic: "Every question Kennedy asked seemed skeptical of the law." -CNN #healthcare #SupremeCourt

Avik Roy: latest from SCOTUSblog: A quick update from the steps. Towards the end of the argument the most important question was Justice Kennedy’s. After pressing the government with great questions Kennedy raised the possibility that the plaintiffs were right that the mandate was a unique effort to force people into commerce to subsidize health insurance but the insurance market may be unique enough to justify that unusual treatment. But he didn’t overtly embrace that. It will be close. Very close.

127 posted on 03/27/2012 9:19:25 AM PDT by alancarp (Liberals are all for shared pain... until they're included in the pain group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson