To: alancarp
SCOTUSblog:
Argument is done. Gov’t has a shot at Kennedy, Alito, and Roberts. But no clear fifth vote. All commerce, no tax power.
sarahkliff:
MT @SCOTUSblog: Update: Paul Clement gave the best argument I’ve ever heard. No real hard questions from the right. Mandate is in trouble.
123 posted on
03/27/2012 9:11:00 AM PDT by
alancarp
(Liberals are all for shared pain... until they're included in the pain group.)
To: alancarp
ShannonBream: SCOTUS: plenty of q's from J Kennedy - 1st - how does my failure to purchase something make me subject to regulation? Janet Adamy @janetadamy #supremecourt WSJ's Kendall Verrilli shifts to another part of his argument: that insurance mandate is permissible under gov's tax authority janetadamy: #supremecourt WSJ's Kendall: This argument hits resistance. Kagan noted the determined efforts of Congress not to label the penalties a tax. #supremecourt WSJ''s Kendall: Scalia said, The president said it wasn't a tax, didn't he? Garrett Love @Garrett_Love RT @KansasSitySinic: "Every question Kennedy asked seemed skeptical of the law." -CNN #healthcare #SupremeCourt Avik Roy: latest from SCOTUSblog: A quick update from the steps. Towards the end of the argument the most important question was Justice Kennedys. After pressing the government with great questions Kennedy raised the possibility that the plaintiffs were right that the mandate was a unique effort to force people into commerce to subsidize health insurance but the insurance market may be unique enough to justify that unusual treatment. But he didnt overtly embrace that. It will be close. Very close.
125 posted on
03/27/2012 9:17:50 AM PDT by
alancarp
(Liberals are all for shared pain... until they're included in the pain group.)
To: alancarp
What was Paul Clement’s argument, should you have the time?
126 posted on
03/27/2012 9:18:09 AM PDT by
Chgogal
(WSJ, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. Thank you.)
To: alancarp
Arrgggg.... i'll try that last one again:
SCOTUS: plenty of q's from J Kennedy - 1st - how does my failure to purchase something make me subject to regulation?
Janet Adamy @janetadamy #supremecourt WSJ's Kendall Verrilli shifts to another part of his argument: that insurance mandate is permissible under gov's tax authority
janetadamy: #supremecourt WSJ's Kendall: This argument hits resistance. Kagan noted the determined efforts of Congress not to label the penalties a tax.
#supremecourt WSJ''s Kendall: Scalia said, The president said it wasn't a tax, didn't he?
Garrett Love @Garrett_Love RT @KansasSitySinic: "Every question Kennedy asked seemed skeptical of the law." -CNN #healthcare #SupremeCourt
Avik Roy: latest from SCOTUSblog: A quick update from the steps. Towards the end of the argument the most important question was Justice Kennedys. After pressing the government with great questions Kennedy raised the possibility that the plaintiffs were right that the mandate was a unique effort to force people into commerce to subsidize health insurance but the insurance market may be unique enough to justify that unusual treatment. But he didnt overtly embrace that. It will be close. Very close.
127 posted on
03/27/2012 9:19:25 AM PDT by
alancarp
(Liberals are all for shared pain... until they're included in the pain group.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson