Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BigSkyFreeper

Probably. Newt also said that it was right to be taken to a grand jury.

I suppose that is also ignored.


102 posted on 03/25/2012 7:52:14 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: dforest
"Newt also said that it was right to be taken to a grand jury."

And???? how does that translate into a presumption of guilt? My god, these people actual think they are conservative.
113 posted on 03/25/2012 7:59:29 PM PDT by JoSixChip (santorum is Mr Rogers without a spine. Check his record, not his rhetoric.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: dforest
-> Newt also said that it was right to be taken to a grand jury.

In the context, if there was enough evidence to do so.

Newt never convicted Zimmerman of the crime. If he had, he would be finished. Ricky, gets Another pass! There was a report that Zimmerman likes to do the neighbor-hood watch as a hobby; giving him something to do (Newt says back-he had a dangerous hobby) Newt said at first everyone should let the investigation move forward so all of the facts could come out. Col. West in FLA was calling for the feds to investigate, not Newt. Newt has said let the local law enforcement people take control and go from what they will do. Newt is the one who called Obama out for playing the race card while Ricky was saying that Zimmerman was guilty before even being charged for a crime. Geez, it's clear as can be, he is not at a presidential level just for saying that.

126 posted on 03/25/2012 8:12:10 PM PDT by Christie at the beach (I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson