Do you understand, you cannot start a fight and then claim self defense, if anyone in this case had the right to claim self defense it is the dead kid, he was the one not doing anything wrong. And that was basically, what the laws author and the two governors said. Now claim they are wrong all you wish, but understand yours is not the majority opinion and in the end all you are going to achieve is that all stand your ground laws will be rewritten. If that is your goal have at it.
org.whodat, I am not trying to be nasty here, but you keep saying Zimmerman started the fight. Perhaps I misunderstand you...can you clarify what you mean?
You say he started a fight. I said PROVE IT. You can't prove it, because your reasoning is absurdly WRONG. Get that through your head. Your assertion is WRONG.
The deceased started pummeling Zimmerman from what we know. Now, if Zimmerman had threatened him or laid a hand upon him, you would be correct. But, according to eyewitnesses, you are WRONG. Get it? Has it sunk in yet? Do you comprehend your mistaken logic?
No?
Then you are inventing a timeline that is not supported by the known facts, therefore, you are either simply misunderstanding your position in relation to the known facts, or you are stubbornly standing by an opinion that has no bearing in reality, IMO.
In either case, I have already pointed out that it is possible that Zimmerman may have started the altercation, but the known facts at this point to not support that position. Your reasoning is completely unfounded from the viewpoint of the officers on the scene who interviewed Mr. Zimmerman and the eyewitnesses.
So, you may continue to make up your illogical fantasy scenario that has no basis in reality, or you can take a moment and analyze the reasons why most people on this forum are repeatedly attempting to explain to you the error of your thinking process.
It's up to you, wallow in your delusional world of irrationality, or open your eyes to reality. Your bleatings are disgusting in the context of this incident, IMO.
Ridiculous. Support this statement.
Since when, in this country, are legal decisions made on the basis of "majority opinion?"