Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trappedincanuckistan
Wouldn’t a deadly attack by definition have to result in death, and isn’t that a little late to be decided on the nature of the attack?

Not if the deadly attack was interrupted by, say, a gunshot.

54 posted on 03/25/2012 1:10:59 PM PDT by Post Toasties (Leftists give insanity a bad name. 0bama: Four years of failure and fingerpointing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Post Toasties

But if it’s interrupted by a gunshot it can’t be considered deadly because it didn’t result in death :)


62 posted on 03/25/2012 1:16:26 PM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson