Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grumpygresh

I thought they passed it specifically as NOT a tax because to do that they would have lacked the votes to pass it, so they called it something else?


27 posted on 03/25/2012 11:14:27 AM PDT by Anima Mundi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Anima Mundi

That’s right. A new tax to fund 0-care would have not passed. During the New Deal, the Marxists also tried to hide the fact that SS was a tax, but the fact is that they did set it up as a tax as is evident by looking at your paycheck. Same thing with Medicare in the 60s. It should also be pointed that because SS is a tax, any promised ‘benefits’ are solely dependent on whatever the government decides it wants to give to the beneficiaries.


31 posted on 03/25/2012 1:28:16 PM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est; zero sera dans l'enfer bientot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson