Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oztrich Boy

Read the last sentence:

Yes it will; however, the telecommunications call taker asked Zimmerman “are you following him”. Zimmerman replied, “yes”. The call taker stated “you don’t need to do that”. The call taker’s suggestion is not a lawful order that Mr. Zimmerman would be required to follow. Zimmerman’s statement was that he had lost sight of Trayvon and was returning to his truck to meet the police officer when he says he was attacked by Trayvon.


139 posted on 03/24/2012 7:06:06 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: TigerClaws; trappedincanuckistan
Zimmerman’s statement was that he had lost sight of Trayvon and was returning to his truck to meet the police officer when he says he was attacked by Trayvon

A statement made after he had shot the young anorak and was trying to establish justifiable homicide.

It is sufficient to establish how the encounter occured from

That says the encounter was only a little over a minute after Zimmerman told the dispatcher he would not be returning to his truck.

141 posted on 03/24/2012 7:23:14 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (This world is a comedy to those that think, a tragedy to those that feel - Horace Walpole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson