Zimmerman had every right to ask Trayvon anything he wanted. Trayvon had no obligation to answer. He could have just told Zimmerman to mind his own business or just ignored him altogether.
Trayvon had no right to physically assault Zimmerman as reported by an eyewitness.
It may shake out as legit SD. Or it may not. But surely you can agree that a “lesson learned” here is that a CCW holder puts himself into grave legal jeapordy if he follows a “suspect,” thereby initiating a series of events.
If the “suspect” pulls a J-turn back at his follower, the SD aspect is put at risk by the follower’s actions before the shooting.
You don’t see this? Really? Does this mean you suggest as a reasonable and recommended practice that CCW holders should follow “suspects” around and demand information from them?
You don’t see how this puts the CCW holder in grave legal danger?