Wrong, if the kid was tying to save his life from a mugger and the mugger broke free and shot him what would be the result. On top does not mean anything other than the kid was fighting for his life from a stalker he did not know.
Making stuff up doesn't help your argument.
You keep calling Zimmerman a “stalker”. Stalking is defined as a repeated and persistent following with no legitimate reason and with the intention of harming.
From what I’ve read, this incident was a brief confrontation, and Zimmerman had a legitimate reason to question the kid. Zimmerman was not “stalking”.
You said the law allows you to punch someone in the face for asking a question. Now prove that assertion by citing the relevant Statute or STFU.
Have a nice day.